Governance Signal Classification Model

AIGA applies a structured classification model to document how governance language evolves across regulated and institutional environments.

This is not a compliance framework.
It is a signal classification structure.

Accountability Signal

Language that assigns, narrows, or shifts decision ownership.

Examples:

  • Named responsible executive

  • Formal delegation language

  • Escalation authority definitions

  • Board-level accountability references

Control Ownership Signal

Language describing who owns oversight mechanisms.

Examples:

  • Risk committee mandate expansion

  • Internal control demarcation

  • Documentation ownership assignment

  • Oversight body authority shifts

Decision Influence Signal

Language defining how AI-supported outputs affect outcomes.

Examples:

  • “Decision support only” terminology

  • “Human-in-the-loop” framing

  • Automated execution language

  • Risk scoring or eligibility authority references

Supervisory Signal

Language anticipating review, audit, or regulatory engagement.

Examples:

  • Supervisory expectation references

  • Board reporting requirements

  • Escalation protocol language

  • Pre-enforcement positioning language

Signal Intensity Scale

Each observed signal is classified using a structured intensity scale:

  • Level 1 — Informational reference

  • Level 2 — Clarification of existing expectation

  • Level 3 — Formal narrowing of accountability language

  • Level 4 — Supervisory posture signal

  • Level 5 — Pre-enforcement positioning language

Framework Boundaries

This framework:

  • Does not assess compliance

  • Does not certify or approve organizations

  • Does not validate implementation

  • Does not replace governance functions

It documents observable shifts in governance language only.