Governance Signal Classification Model
AIGA applies a structured classification model to document how governance language evolves across regulated and institutional environments.
This is not a compliance framework.
It is a signal classification structure.
Accountability Signal
Language that assigns, narrows, or shifts decision ownership.
Examples:
Named responsible executive
Formal delegation language
Escalation authority definitions
Board-level accountability references
Control Ownership Signal
Language describing who owns oversight mechanisms.
Examples:
Risk committee mandate expansion
Internal control demarcation
Documentation ownership assignment
Oversight body authority shifts
Decision Influence Signal
Language defining how AI-supported outputs affect outcomes.
Examples:
“Decision support only” terminology
“Human-in-the-loop” framing
Automated execution language
Risk scoring or eligibility authority references
Supervisory Signal
Language anticipating review, audit, or regulatory engagement.
Examples:
Supervisory expectation references
Board reporting requirements
Escalation protocol language
Pre-enforcement positioning language
Signal Intensity Scale
Each observed signal is classified using a structured intensity scale:
Level 1 — Informational reference
Level 2 — Clarification of existing expectation
Level 3 — Formal narrowing of accountability language
Level 4 — Supervisory posture signal
Level 5 — Pre-enforcement positioning language
Framework Boundaries
This framework:
Does not assess compliance
Does not certify or approve organizations
Does not validate implementation
Does not replace governance functions
It documents observable shifts in governance language only.
AIGA is an independent governance signal observatory.
All publications are observational analyses of public language patterns and do not constitute legal, regulatory, compliance, or advisory services.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Disclaimer
